![]() ![]() Footnote 1 Or even if it increases the likelihood of translating technical leadership to those countries where the would-be collaborators who are being discriminated against, reside or where such burdens are less. No surprise if the upshot of regulatory burden is to reduce the likelihood of the extraordinary translating to the clinic. Sadly, no one or institution stands against this modern-day Inquisition. One can be fired or banned for practicing centuries-old traditions of scientific collaboration without such approvals. Outside reviews and approvals for safety conflicts-of-interest (COIs) the race and gender of participants and more recently in the USA, government permission for international collaborations and for non-citizen scientists to work on a project, even when they are the ones championing it. Set against the desirable outcome of such endeavors–the bench to bedside proofing of the pudding-is an ever growing regulatory minefield. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |